Speaking
Keynotes, invited talks, panels, and conference contributions on AI in medicine, medical education, healthcare systems, and professional judgement.
Work
Talks, workshops and selective collaboration for thoughtful AI use.
Public principles and writing are freely shared. Professional talks, guided workshops, and selective educational or advisory projects are scoped separately, including fees where applicable. The aim is deliberate AI use that develops understanding, capability and judgement.
Workshops
Guided practice in source checking, thoughtful prompting, and explaining conclusions in your own words. Audience, exercises, scope, and evaluation are agreed with the organiser; no blanket learning-outcome guarantee.
Collaborations
Selective teaching, writing, curriculum, faculty development, and strategic advisory discussions. Responsibilities, confidentiality, and deliverables are agreed before work begins; institutional implementation remains with the responsible organisation.
Good fit
- Medical colleges, faculties, hospitals, and professional societies
- Conference organisers seeking AI-related keynotes or workshops
- Institutions working on AI governance, literacy, or implementation
- Collaborators interested in writing, curriculum, or academic projects
You can also review selected universities, colleges, and professional bodies on the institutions page.
Examples of preparation and method
Concrete work, with clear limits
Strategic thinking for hospital leaders
Prepared briefing · October 2026. Better Strategic Thinking with AI explores defining the decision before prompting, comparing alternatives, checking evidence, and retaining human accountability. A fictional case illustrates the approach.
Available as a topic for a scoped discussion; not a delivered board workshop, implemented hospital programme, or evaluated intervention. The private briefing is not published here.
From a paper or podcast to learning
Select a source → read critically → create an original synthesis → prepare editable phone-friendly learning slides → check the slides and notes against the source → practise unaided recall.
State whether the input was a full paper, a secondary guide, or an interview. Separate source claims from interpretation. A useful learning artifact is not evidence of improved learning; private decks and copyrighted transcripts stay off this site.
Critical evidence appraisal
Start with the exact claim. Trace it to primary sources; inspect study design, population, comparators, uncertainty, and contradictory results. Distinguish an association or promising biomarker from a validated clinical test.
The output is a bounded evidence brief with explicit limitations and unanswered questions—not a new research discovery, clinical recommendation, or promise of effectiveness.
Next step
Discuss a talk, workshop or educational collaboration
Tell us your audience, objective, preferred format, and approximate date. Please do not send patient information or confidential institutional documents.
Discuss a talk or workshop See delivered sessions